I care so much about my state, and this is really a new thing for me, to absolutely love my state and never want to move. I moved a lot growing up, usually living in one place no more than four our five years. I attended five different schools by the time I was in 8th grade.
But now in North Carolina, we have put down strong and deep roots, both on a personal level, raising our daughter here for 12 years, and on a professional level. We’ve made a huge family investment by building the Manifold Recording studio in Pittsboro. It is a dream come true project for us, one that required five years of time and treasure to build. Now Michael and I are like Ray and Annie Kinsella in Field of Dreams, living out the “if you build it, they will come” aspect of the project. It is going very well. This is our home and we never want to leave.
BUT. But at the same time, our state is under fire from many directions. So in May and June I found myself investing a lot of time in statewide causes, particluarly the effort to stop fracking from being legalized in North Carolina. You can read my previous informational posts on fracking:
What you need to know about Fracking in 400 words or less
This spring, I started a Facebook page, Don’t Frack North Carolina — Citizens Say No to Fracking in NC, which really took off in May and June. The page has grown into a community of more than 4100 people who “like” it, and that adds up to a viral outreach of more than 1 million “friends of friends.” We sent many letters and made calls to the Governor and legislators to try to stop the pro-fracking bill. We had a brief victory when Governor Bev Perdue vetoed the bill. I am truly, truly grateful to the Governor for taking this courageous stand. But then the worst possible outcome came when the legislature voted to overturn the veto and it was overturned by ONE vote. As if that’s not bad enough, some Democrats voted to over-ride the veto, and two in particular stand out. Representative Becky Carney of Mecklenburg accidentally voted YES instead of NO and the Republicans would not let her correct the mistake. And Representative. Susi Hamilton of New Hanover county voted to overturn the veto under pressure that reportedly involved cutting a deal to get $60 million in film tax breaks for Wilmington. Now I love the film industry in North Carolina–but it should have nothing to do with whether fracking is allowed! Democrats were furious after seeing Hamilton give a fellow legislator a “high-five” after the film tax breaks passed. She really sold out the environment in the whole state in a case of brazen political dealing. I hope she realizes that her district is directly down stream from the frack target zone. Environmental problems from fracking will flow right into the Cape Fear River in HER back yard. Hamilton was supposed to be an environmentalist. The League of Conservation Voters had just given her a “rising star” award in June, which they swiftly revoked after Hamilton’s vote in favor of opening our state to fracking.
To say I feel demoralized right now is an understatement. I am very discouraged, but not giving up. My natural optimism has taken a blow. I no longer feel that things will naturally get better, that worst case scenarios will inevitably be avoided, that our leaders will be wise and ultimately do the right thing. I am probably more realistic–this will be a hard fight and a long road to travel. I miss my can-do, “Mojo Mom” optimism as applied to protecting my home state. It fueled me. But now I am faced with a grittier, flintier reality. The Democrats are in deep trouble. The Republicans are on an ALEC-fueled tear. I am in the process of trying to figure out how I can make the biggest contribution I can with my time, talents and energy. I will be working hard to re-elect President Obama and devoting serious time to several of my statewide causes.
At the same time, it’s time to get back to my own work. I have good things developing over at www.DoingRightByOurKids.com that I will be sharing here. As I told my co-creator Irene van der Zande last time we talked, politics is very frustrating because you can work hard and lose, or see progress go backward. When you teach people about protecting child safety, giving them a solid framework, excellent information, and tools for respectful relationship building, you are making progress that will move forward to create better communities. So that is the kind of work I need to be doing in balance with my political activities. Onward…..
[correction, July 10: an earlier version of this post mixed up the words "overturned" and "sustained" in regards to Governor Perdue's veto. This updated version correctly states that Democrats Becky Carney and Susi Hamilton voted to over-ride the Governor's veto.]
My previous Mojo Mom blog post was the long version of just about everything I have learned about fracking and why you should care. Here is the nutshell version in 400 words and four illustrations.
What is Hydro-Fracking?
To recover natural gas deposits in shale formations…the industry uses a process termed high volume hydraulic fracturing, which uses millions of gallons of water, laced with a cocktail of chemicals, to fracture shale and release gas.
Inherent Risks of Hydro-Fracking
Hydro-fracking activities operate 24 hours a day, 7 days a week during production. Volumes of toxic, radioactive, and caustic liquid waste by-products pose storage, treatment, and disposal problems. Regular operations, as well as accidents can adversely impact the environment and public health. Especially problematic is the lack of federal protection for drinking water, air quality, water treatment infrastructure, and landowner liability.
Communities from Texas to Pennsylvania have already been impacted from industrial hydro-fracking operations. A peer reviewed study published in the National Academy of Science found water wells near gas wells had 17 times higher methane levels. Families in Dimock, PA live with drinking water contaminated with methane and heavy metals. Blowouts from gas wells have spewed liquid fracking waste into the air and into local streams.
Primary concerns include human and environmental exposure to:
• Radioactivity that is a physical characteristic of Marcellus shale.
• The hazardous cocktail of hydro-fracking chemicals injected into the ground.
• Air pollution from diesel engines, compressor stations, and flaring.
• Brine that is 5x saltier than seawater that can damage freshwater streams and lakes, as well as corrode infrastructure.
• Hazardous liquid and solid waste that is stored on-site, transported on public roads, and disposed of at municipal landfills or sewage treatment plants.
Anti-fracking action seems to be taking place on the state or local level, so consult your local environmental and clean-water organizations to learn more about fracking where you live.
Have you heard about “fracking”? Hydraulic fracturing, also known as hyrdofracking or simply fracking, is a form of natural gas mining that has wells popping up in many regions across the United States. One of the hotbeds of activity is in northeastern Pennsylvania, where the discovery of the Marcellus Shale gas deposits has transformed quiet rural communities into gas boom towns, much to the dismay and regret of many residents.
Photo from the Gas Wells Are Not Our Friends blog, Bradford County, Pennsylvania.
The natural gas industry would like to paint this mining technique as an economic boom and an alternative to foreign oil. Environmentalists are raising significant questions about the dangers of this mining activity and the lack of regulation that the industry is subject to. Also, like oil and coal, “natural gas” is a fossil fuel that creates greenhouse gases (carbon dioxide) when burned, so it’s not getting us away from fuels that contribute to global warming. In fact, methane itself is a potent greenhouse gas, 20 times more effective in trapping heat in the atmosphere than carbon dioxide, so reducing direct methane emissions is an important environmental concern.
Natural gas is a gas consisting primarily of methane….Before natural gas can be used as a fuel, it must undergo processing to remove almost all materials other than methane. The by-products of that processing include ethane, propane, butanes, pentanes, and higher molecular weight hydrocarbons, elemental sulfur, carbon dioxide, water vapor, and sometimes helium and nitrogen.
Fracking is an issue that could affect your water supply and environment. Based on what I have learned so far, fracking is a potentially damaging and dangerous activity that is not regulated or researched nearly stringently enough given the potential damages it could cause.
A legal term for this is that fracking creates “negative externalities”–as in, the gas companies can come in, frack away and create great damage, messes and problems that the industry is not responsible for cleaning up. (The opposite of the “Pottery Barn” doctrine, “you break it, you buy it.”)
I am sharing this on the Mojo Mom blog because this issue affects millions of people across the nation and yet it is an issue that is just making its way onto the public’s consciousness. The independent film Gasland has helped get the story out. But the natural gas industry is moving very quickly to secure gas leases across the country, even in places where fracking is currently illegal, and is putting in wells at an alarming rate where they can.
Next time you read a national magazine or newspaper, keep an eye out for industry ads. Oil companies and their trade group have invested heavily in campaign contributions and lobbying. The oil and natural gas sector has bankrolled $347 million on lobbying since 2008, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.
The pro-gas ads have become prevalent here in North Carolina where fracking is currently illegal, and citizens are working hard to keep it that way while the Natural Gas industry pressures state legislators to change the law.
There is so much to share on this subject that it’s very hard to keep it brief, but my goal is to write a short primer on fracking and share more resources (and references) at the end of this post. [This post ended up being quite long but I will create a short excerpt too!]
What is fracking?
Hydraulic fracturing is a method of mining natural gas from shale deposits located thousands of feet below ground level. A well is drilled straight down for a mile and then the drill turns 90 degrees and proceeds to drill horizontally for another couple of miles. Then high pressure fluid, a million gallons of water mixed with proprietary fracking fluids per “frack,” are injected into the ground to create fractures that will release the methane gas which is then collected. Sand or other materials are also injected to keep the fracture from closing up.
Fracturing is necessary because in these formations, the gas is trapped in the shale and it has to be disrupted by micro-earthquakes and fractures to release the gas.
My first common sense concern about this idea is to wonder what happens when you put thousands or millions of new fractures into the ground beneath our feet? The geological impact of this is not well studied, but to me it seems like a terrible idea to literally undermine the ground we walk on in this way.
Earthquakes induced by human activity have been documented in a few locations in the United States, Japan, and Canada. The cause was injection of fluids into deep wells for waste disposal and secondary recovery of oil, and the use of reservoirs for water supplies. Most of these earthquakes were minor. The largest and most widely known resulted from fluid injection at the Rocky Mountain Arsenal near Denver, Colorado. In 1967, an earthquake of magnitude 5.5 followed a series of smaller earthquakes. Injection had been discontinued at the site in the previous year once the link between the fluid injection and the earlier series of earthquakes was established.
Where is all that water going to come from and where will it go after it is turned into industrial waste?
Wastewater disposal wells have also been blamed for giant sinkholes that have put towns like Daisetta Texas “on shaky ground.” When you put a million gallons of water, fracking fluid, and sand into a well, you get a lot of that flowing back to the surface (30% -50%), and that now-contaminated water has to go somewhere. Plus, where are we going to get those MANY millions of gallons of water from? Remember, it takes a million+ gallons of water PER WELL. Other uses, even something that sounds luxurious like watering a golf course, do return water into the ecosystem and water cycle. But with fracking, the water goes into the well and what comes out must be treated as waste and disposed of, through methods including in waste injection wells, being evaporated into the air (releasing volatile organic compounds), or being absorbed with sawdust and put into a landfill.
What are contamination issues with groundwater?The natural gas industry is fond of saying that there is no scientific proof that fracking fluids contaminate ground water (drinking water). But the gas industry is less likely to point out there there IS scientific evidence that fracking does contaminate drinking water wells with methane, up to one kilometer away–leading levels of methane that are exceeding action level for hazard mitigation defined by the US Department of the Interior. And there could be more pollution of drinking water from fracking activities–including containment ponds on the ground surface. There is active research being done in this area right now, including taking baseline measurements of ground water, which the gas industry was not required to do before installing wells. It could take ten years to do all the research needed to determine whether and how fracking could be done safely, and by that point the damage will be done. Why isn’t the burden incumbent on the gas industry to prove that fracking is safe BEFORE they do it? Good question!
How un-regulated is the fracking industry?
Federal regulation is very weak. Fracking is not subject to the Clean Air Act or the Clean Drinking Water Act, thanks to legislation by the Bush/Cheney administration that specifically exempts the industry from these regulations—commonly called the Halliburton Loophole.
In North Carolina, our new Republican-majority state legislature changed state law so that state-mandated regulations cannot be stricter than federal legislation, meaning that the industry cannot be subject to state regulations that would make up for the lax federal oversight. To me that is an absolute dealbreaker right there, yet this same Legislature is actively exploring and in many cases promoting fracking interests.
What are other social costs of fracking?
Turning a rural agricultural community into a gas boom town is an ugly business. In Pennsylvania, farmers who regret signing gas leases have reported that their farms are burdened by more mining-related equipment than they expected, including well pads, compression stations and wastewater impoundment ponds that impede their ability to farm their land. Streets have been damaged by heavy truck traffic to the point where roads are impassable for two weeks. Longtime residents of Bradford County say that the gas industry brought to town divorce, crime, full jails, traffic jams, a housing shortage with increased rent from $200 to $5000 a month, displacing long-time residents; contaminated beef, farmland that needs massive work to be reclaimed, loss of tourism due to dead zones that no one wants to come visit anymore. Trees are seen as a nuisance and are being chipped and not even used for timber.
The heart of the tragedy keeps coming back to environmental damage and health hazards. From the Vanity Fair article, “A Colossal Fracking Mess,” June 21, 2010:
The real shock that Dimock [Pennsylvania] has undergone, however, is in the aquifer that residents rely on for their fresh water. Dimock is now known as the place where, over the past two years, people’s water started turning brown and making them sick, one woman’s water well spontaneously combusted, and horses and pets mysteriously began to lose their hair.
The former mayor of DISH Texas, Calvin Tillman, now working with shaletest.org, moved out of his town after his young sons started to get nosebleeds at night. An air quality study found multiple human carcinogens in the air. Tillman sold his home at a loss and required that the buyers watch Gasland as a condition of the sale.
What about jobs and the economy?
The costs of cleaning up after fracking are heavily borne by local or state governments who are unprepared to take on these problems.
In Pennsylvania, some operators have shipped the discharge to wastewater treatment plants. But these plants can’t handle or even detect many of the types of chemicals and salts and, in some cases, naturally occurring radioactivity. In Pittsburgh, radioactive material from discharge passed through a city treatment plant and wound up in the drinking water supply.
Landowners who leased their land for mining may end up being held liable for environmental damage in neighboring areas.
There are jobs to be had, primarily commercial truck driving and specialty jobs as welders or technicians in the industry–jobs that local residents may not qualify for.
Someone will make a quick buck on all this activity but we should not be willing to sell out our communities for a gas boom that lasts a decade or so. When the boom is over local people will likely be left with a painful economic bust and the job of cleaning up severe, even epic, environmental impacts. (The question of who in your state stands to make money, besides the gas industry itself, is an important one to investigate because that will help you identify sources of political pressure.)
I highly recommend you read blogs of local communities in Pennsylvania and Texas to learn more, and take a close look at the impacts that are already taking place, and the intense leaser’s remorse being experienced in many communities. This photo from “Bob’s Blog” telling the story of fracking near Hickory, in Washington County Pennsylvania, really caught my attention:
And if you are an urban citizen and think that this doesn’t affect you, think again. The Delaware River used to be clean, and now it is has been designated America’s most threatened river. And, oh yeah, it happens to be a major drinking water source for Philadelphia, New York City and New Jersey. More than 15 million people get their drinking water from the Delaware River’s once-pristine watershed.
This affects all of us and we need to educate ourselves about fracking and get involved in our state. Learn from what others have gone through. This is truly one of those issues that I can’t stand by and watch passively–my daughter would never forgive me. North Carolina doesn’t even show up on this map of shale gas plays in the continental USA, but our relatively small “Triassic Basin” deposits–small on this map but affecting 14 counties here at home in NC–are enough to generate a lot of interest. The heart of this deposit lies close to the Shearon Harris nuclear power plant and Jordan Lake, the drinking water supply for Raleigh, not to mention acres of precious farmland. If we screw all this up with fracking, we are truly reckless and unable to learn from history or other communities’ mistakes.
If not otherwise noted or linked, facts cited in this article are from my notes from the “Don’t Rush to Frack Summit” sponsored by Clean Water for North Carolina on September 10, 2011 in Pittsboro North Carolina
Expert: State regulation of fracking crucial by Laura Leslie on WRAL.com. An interview with scientist Professor Robert Jackson is Nicholas Chair of Global Environmental Change at Duke. Jackson is one of the authors of the first peer-reviewed study to measure well-water contamination from shale-gas drilling and hydrofracking.
Despite the dangers of fracking, North Carolina lawmakers want to legalize it by Lisa Sorg, Indyweek.com.
North Carolina legislature considers hydraulic fracturing by Memet Walker, The Daily Tar Heel, September 20, 2011.
The top ten most surprising things I learned at the [Pittsboro NC] Fracking Summit by Tara, blogger on Progressive Democrats of North Carolina.
ProPublica reporting by Abram Lustgarten, Science Lags as Health Problems Emerge Near Gas Fields, September 16, 2011.
Fresh Air with Terry Gross interview with Abram Lustgarten, September 29, 2011.
Game Changer episode of This American Life, July 8, 2011, tells of environmental problems near Pittsburgh and other parts of Pennsylvania, and the complicated relationship between Penn State University and the methane gas industry.
This post is already very long, so I don’t want to go into this issue in detail, but it’s worth knowing that in North Dakota, natural gas is being burned off every day in large quantities:
In North Dakota, Flames of Wasted Natural Gas Light the Prairie, New York Times, September 26, 2011
The gas bubbles up alongside the far more valuable oil, and with less economic incentive to capture it, the drillers treat the gas as waste and simply burn it. Every day, more than 100 million cubic feet of natural gas is flared this way — enough energy to heat half a million homes for a day.